Résultats: 36

    All the Talents: how new roles and better teamwork can release potential and improve health services

    Led by Lord Nigel Crisp, (Member of House of Lords (UK) and champion of the Global Health Workforce Alliance), the All-Party Parliamentary Groups (APPG) on Global Health and Africa launched a new report "All the Talents". The report looks at how innovations in the skill mix of health workers can improve ...

    Outils du projet SUPPORT pour l´élaboration des politiques de santé éclairées par les données probantes 14: organisation et utilisation de dialogues sur les politiques à l´appui de l´élaboration de politiques éclairées par les données probantes
    SUPPORT Toolkit for Evidence-Informed Health Policy Development 14: Organizing and Using Policy Dialogues to Support Evidence-Informed Policy Development

    Les dialogues sur les politiques permettent dexaminer les données de recherche parallèlement aux perspectives, aux expériences et aux connaissances tacites des personnes qui participent à la prise de décisions relatives à une question hautement prioritaire, ou qui sont touchées par de telles déci...

    SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health (STP) 6: using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. After a policy decision has been made, the next key challenge is transforming this stated policy position into practical actions. What...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: finding systematic reviews

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. Systematic reviews are increasingly seen as a key source of information in policymaking, particularly in terms of assisting with descr...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 9: assessing the applicability of the findings of a systematic review

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. Differences between health systems may often result in a policy or programme option that is used in one setting not being feasible or ...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed Policymaking in health (STP) 11: finding and using evidence about local conditions

    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. Evidence about local conditions is evidence that is available from the specific setting(s) in which a decision or action on a policy o...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs

    In this article, we address considerations about resource use and costs. The consequences of a policy or programme option for resource use differ from other impacts (both in terms of benefits and harms) in several ways. However, considerations of the consequences of options for resource use are similar t...

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 13: preparing and using policy briefs to support evidence-informed policymaking

    Policy briefs are a relatively new approach to packaging research evidence for policymakers. The first step in a policy brief is to prioritise a policy issue. Once an issue is prioritised, the focus then turns to mobilising the full range of research evidence relevant to the various features of the issue...

    STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 8: cómo decidir qué tanta confianza depositar en una revisión sistemática
    STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 8: how to decide how much confidence to place in a systematic review

    La confiabilidad de las revisiones sistemáticas en cuanto a los efectos de las intervenciones sanitarias es variable. En consecuencia, los responsables de la toma de decisiones en políticas y las demás personas necesitan evaluar qué tanta confianza puede depositarse en dicha evidencia. El uso de proc...

    STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 5: cómo utilizar la evidencia de la investigación para el encuadre de las opciones para abordar un problema
    STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 5: how to use research evidence to frame options to address a problem

    Los responsables de la toma de decisiones en políticas y quienes los respaldan pueden encontrarse en una o más de las siguientes tres situaciones que requerirán que caractericen los costos y las consecuencias de las opciones para abordar un problema. Estas son: 1. Ya se tomó una decisión y su rol es...