Accueil > PIE > Résultat de la recherche

    Résultats: 23

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 8: deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review

    Lewin, S; Fretheim, A; Oxman, A. D; Lavis, J. N.
    This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. The reliability of systematic reviews of the effects of health interventions is variable. Consequently, policymakers and others need t...
    Processus politique, Revues systématiques comme sujet, Prise de décision
    Texte intégral

    SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 14: organising and using policy dialogues to support evidence-informed policymaking

    Oxman, A. D; Boyko, J; Lavis, J. N; Lewin, S; Fretheim, A.
    Policy dialogues allow research evidence to be considered together with the views, experiences and tacit knowledge of those who will be involved in, or affected by, future decisions about a highpriority issue. Increasing interest in the use of policy dialogues has been fuelled by a number of factors: 1. ...
    Prise de décision, Processus politique, Politique Éclairée par la Preuve, Recommandations de consensus, Consensus
    Texte intégral

    SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health (STP) 16: using research evidence in balancing the pros and cons of policies

    Lewin, S; Oxman, A. D; Lavis, J. N; Fretheim, A.
    In this article, we address the use of evidence to inform judgements about the balance between the pros and cons of policy and programme options. We suggest five questions that can be considered when making these judgements. These are: 1. What are the options that are being compared? 2. What are the most...
    Processus politique, Politique Éclairée par la Preuve, Développement Technologique et Recherche Scientifique, Prise de décision, Désaccords et litiges
    Texte intégral