Total: 933

STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 14: cómo organizar y usar los diálogos de políticas (policy dialogues) para respaldar la toma de decisiones en políticas informada por la evidencia
STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 14: how to organize and use policy dialogues to support decision-making in policies informed by evidence

Los diálogos de políticas (policy dialogues) permiten que la evidencia de la investigación sea considerada como un todo junto con los puntos de vistas, las experiencias y los conocimientos tácitos de quienes estarán involucrados en, o afectados por, futuras decisiones sobre un asunto de alta priorid...

STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 17: cómo lidiar con evidencia de investigación insuficiente
STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 17: how to deal with insufficient research evidence

En este artículo abordamos el tema de la toma de decisiones en situaciones donde no se cuenta con suficiente evidencia disponible. Los responsables de la toma de decisiones en políticas a menudo no tienen suficiente evidencia para saber con certeza cuáles serán los impactos de una opción de programa...

STP: Herramientas SUPPORT para la toma de decisiones en políticas de salud informada por la evidencia 16: cómo usar la evidencia de la investigación para balancear los pros y los contras de las políticas
STP: SUPPORT tools for decision-making in health policies informed by evidence 16: how to use research evidence to balance the pros and cons of policies

En este artículo abordamos el uso de la evidencia para aportar información sobre el balance entre los pros y los contras de las opciones de políticas y programas. Sugerimos cinco preguntas que pueden tenerse en cuenta cuando se emiten estas opiniones. Éstas son: 1. ¿Cuáles son las opciones que est...

Ferramentas SUPPORT para a elaboração de políticas de saúde baseadas em evidências (STP) 17: como lidar com insuficiente evidência de pesquisa?
SUPPORT tools for evidence-based health policy making (STP) 17: How to deal with insufficient research evidence?

Neste artigo, trataremos do problema de tomar de decisões em situações nas quais há evidências insuficientes disponíveis. Geralmente, os formuladores de políticas têm poucas evidências para realmente conhecer os impactos futuros de uma opção de política ou programa de saúde mas devem, ainda ...

Ferramentas SUPPORT para a elaboração de políticas de saúde baseadas em evidências (STP) 16: o uso de evidências de pesquisa para avaliar os prós e contras das políticas
SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-Based Health Policy Making (STP) 16: Using Research Evidence to Assess Policy Pros and Cons

Neste artigo, abordamos o uso de evidências para informar julgamentos sobre a avaliação dos prós e contras das opções de políticas e programas. Sugerimos cinco questões que podem ser consideradas ao fazer estes julgamentos. Estas são: 1. Que opções estão sendo comparadas? 2. Quais são os res...

Policy brief 12: how can gender equity be addressed through health systems?

Gender differences in health and in how well health systems and health care services meet the needs of women and men are well known: in Europe, there are variations in terms of life expectancy, the risk of mortality and morbidity, health behaviours and in the use of health care services. There is also in...

Evidence Brief: Supporting Chronic Pain Management across Provincial and Territorial Health Systems in Canada

Chronic pain is a serious health problem given its prevalence, associated disability, impact on quality of life, and the costs associated with the extensive use of healthcare services by people living with chronic pain.(1) In Canada, some investments have been made to strengthen chronic pain management. ...

Policy brief 11: how can European states design efficient, equitable and sustainable funding systems for long-term care for older people?

Assessing different options for the funding of long-term care – that is, nonmedical assistance provided to people with physical or mental health needs to help cope with the everyday activities of life – raises three key issues. First, it requires an assessment of the future need for long-term care se...

Issue brief: Engaging Civil Society in Supporting Research Use in Health Systems

While the term “civil society” is in widespread use in many countries, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, in some countries (such as Canada) the terms “voluntary organization,” “non-governmental organization,” and “advocacy group” are much more commonly used.(1) The term ...

3. 2 million stillbirths: epidemiology and overview of the evidence review

More than 3.2 million stillbirths occur globally each year, yet stillbirths are largely invisible in global data tracking, policy dialogue and programme implementation. This mismatch of burden to action is due to a number of factors that keep stillbirths hidden, notably a lack of data and a lack of conse...