Community involvement in tuberculosis care and prevention: towards partnerships for health: guiding principles and recommendations based on a WHO review
Publication year: 2008
Until very recently, the approaches to TB care and control have been focused in most
settings on the essential public health and medical interventions with very limited
scope to contribution by communities. And yet, the issue of community involvement
in public health approaches and in the delivery of health to people is not new. Already
30 years ago, the conclusions of the historical “International Conference on Primary
Health Care” in Alma-Ata on 6–12 September 1978 emphasized “the importance of
full and organized community participation and ultimate self-reliance with individuals, families, and communities assuming more responsibility for their own health”.
Indeed, the Declaration of Alma-Ata was very explicit: “The people have the right and
duty to participate individually and collectively in the planning and implementation of
their health care”. In that Declaration, the concept of primary health care as the key to
accessing health for all and, thus, fostering societal development was linked for ever to
that of social justice. Despite these visionary statements, not much had happened in the
delivery of TB care and control with regards to community engagement during the two
decades that followed. A few local projects had been started in different regions of the
world. However, it was only in the second half of the 1990s that, in the spirit of Alma-Ata
and based on the evidence of success emerging from HIV/AIDS community projects,
the WHO TB programme embarked on a broader-scale assessment of community participation in the care of TB patients in several African countries. The experience gained
reassured the many sceptics that non-medical, often non-governmental staff (in other
words, community workers and volunteers) could support national programme efforts
effectively with much increased treatment completion and cure rates. Even from an economic viewpoint, community participation in care was assessed as highly cost-effective,
with major savings in hospitalization costs and with remarkable benefi ts to patients and
communities affected.